‘You Are Being Brainwashed’

Here’s a thoughtful video from Rob Dial, with the message that “you are being brainwashed” by the media you consume, especially the negative crime news that makes you feel the world is an unsafe place, when in reality the world is physically safer than it has ever been.

And yet, instead of a blanket blaming of “the media,” I believe media consumers must become more selective and purposeful. Yes, if you eat a steady diet of junk food, you will probably become overweight or anemic — unhealthy. Your brain works the same way. If you consume a steady diet of junk media, you will become an airhead who believes things that aren’t true and can’t converse intelligently on the issues of the day. Choose media that informs, enlightens and challenges you to think.

My daily media diet from the US includes “All Things Considered” from National Public Radio, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal.  Internationally, I read The Economist, peruse The (UAE) National, and Gulf News.

What does your daily media diet consist of?


Newspaper Investigations Become Ebooks

Readers may not yet be willing to pay much for online editions of newspapers, but The Washington Post is leveraging the great reporting, strong writing and editing skills of its staff, as well as its massive archive of stories, into some impressive ebooks on important issues, available to download for between 99 cents and $5. Click.

Other newspapers around the world should follow the Post’s lead. This might not become a big revenue source, but it might give readers incentives to pay for annual online subscriptions in order to access the ebooks. Newspapers are still a great value.

Students in Media Law might be particularly interested in

3 Generations of Journalists, Each With Different Perspectives

“Every generation creates its own journalism,” write Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel in “The Elements of Journalism.”

I often think how journalism, and communications in general, have changed dramatically since my teachers and mentors made their marks on the profession. They were mostly World War II, Korean War or Vietnam War veterans who distinguished themselves as reporters or editors on newspapers or magazines, back in the days when newspapers and magazines were highly profitable. A man (yes, nearly all my undergraduate and graduate school teachers were men) could support his family on one solid salary as a senior reporter or editor.

But as we all know, the business model for newspapers and magazines has collapsed, and the opportunities for the older generation now mostly retired have not been as available for younger generations. Two-career partners are mostly essential nowadays to support a family in a modest middle-class lifestyle. The idea of spending your entire career with one employer, and eventually collecting a comfortable pension has largely disappeared, at least in America.

The very thought of settling on one career, or one profession, in your early twenties and sticking with it until retirement may be exceedingly rare, and may not even be desirable for upcoming generations who aren’t likely to retire until age 70 or later.

In the evolving field of 21st century communication, a college graduate could spend his first decade after college as a reporter and editor, his second decade in broadcast media, his third decade in interactive advertising, his fourth decade in public relations, advocacy or as a government spokesman, and a fifth decade in international media.

While opportunities may be shrinking in print journalism, new opportunities for people who like to write, tell stories, shoot photos and videos, combine images, sound and words into evocative presentations may be greater than my mentors in the pre-digital age ever dreamed.

I think about the courses I took in undergraduate journalism and graduate school and compare them to the far wider variety of courses in Communications offered today by my alma maters, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and American University in Washington, DC.

Is it even advisable to major in journalism, when newspapers and magazines are shrinking, there are currently so few well-paying outlets and everyone is capable of becoming a publisher online? I would say, yes, if you abandon some of the rigid lines of demarcation, tensions and hostilities between print, broadcast, public relations, advertising, old and new media that I and my colleagues embraced. In other words, don’t pass up opportunities to learn it all.

When I was in school, as a “journalism major,” you chose whether you were in print journalism, broadcast journalism, or public relations and advertising. Print journalists looked suspiciously on the others — especially the seemingly more glamorous but less substantive field of broadcast journalism. “Bubble-headed bleached blondes” was a favorite pejorative we print journalists had for what we thought were the more beautiful people on local TV news. Nowadays I admire journalists who have developed good skills with audio, film and video, either in front of or behind the camera, as “digital storytellers.” I see it as a powerful tool.

“Respectable” broadcast news outlets like National Public Radio were in their infancy when I was in j-school. I had one friend who pursued a career in public radio news, but when he was laid off from a low-budget local public radio station, I thanked my lucky stars I did not go down the same path. But when he quickly landed on his feet, started working for another non-profit news radio network, and within a few years landed a position as a reporter for National Public Radio, I took notice. Maybe he did have a viable career path after all. For many years now he has been a bureau chief for NPR. Irony of ironies, he is well-compensated and his career has been quite stable compared to those of us who specialized in print journalism. Kudos to him for latching onto public radio in its early stages of development and riding it into a sustainable future.

Back in j-school, we print journalists also looked askance at PR and advertising.  We were taught that there should be a high ethical wall between “non-profit” journalists and “for profit” public relations and advertising. “Flacks” pitched one side of the story; we journalists reported the whole story, or the real truth, or so we thought. The more I studied and experienced media, the more I realized how wrong my assumption had been.

When I was in j-school, real journalists weren’t supposed to learn much about the business side of the profession, because it might somehow taint their expressed motive to report “without fear or favor,” regardless of the business interests of their employers. Journalists who ventured into PR or took an interest in advertising we considered “sell outs.”

Nowadays, many “ink-stained wretches,” as old newspapermen still call themselves, expect to go the way of the dinosaur. It’s hard to sustain a career with long hours and low pay in a digital sweatshop where profit margins are low or non-existent.

Under financial pressure, journalists nowadays need to understand the business side of their profession, to become more entrepreneurial, and to experiment with new revenue streams and ways to sustain and strengthen the loyalty of readers.

I’ve also changed my perspective on so-called “sell outs.” After spending their early career chasing the news at all hours of the day or night, who can blame a well-trained communicator to look for a better financial deal, and less demanding hours, not in newspaper journalism but in one of those fields he once denigrated, like advocacy, public relations, interactive advertising and social media? That’s what I did. And I discovered it wasn’t all that different from traditional journalism. It’s all storytelling.

An early career in journalism can provide great training for a later career in public relations. The opposite, however, is not true: you can’t easily transition from public relations into journalism because of the suspicion if not the reality that you haven’t learned to tell all sides of the story and are more accustomed to promoting people or points of view than in presenting information in a fair, balanced and detached way. You might be able to move from journalism into advertising, but you can’t generally move from advertising into journalism for the same reasons. There are still professional red lines that can’t or shouldn’t be crossed because they stab at the heart of your credibility as a professional communicator.

There are exceptions to these rules. The final judge will always be the quality of the products you create, and whether you have disclosed to the public what they need to know to judge the accuracy of your work.

Drill Deeper:


Positive and Negative Trends in Journalism Since 2007

In Com 315 (Storytelling II), students read “The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect” by Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel. The book is still quite relevant, addressing the massive changes in the news business due to the digital revolution. But the last edition was published in 2007 before several big events hit:

Negative trends since 2007:

  • Major recession if not a Great Depression in the news business, leading to big decline in advertising revenue, continued sharp decline in paid subscriptions to print publications, massive layoffs, closings and foreclosures of newspapers, sharp reduction in the number of employees with publishing organizations.
  • Additional scandals in journalism such as phone hacking and shutting down of “News of the World” in Britain that reinforce the notion that some journalists are ethically challenged, corrupt or unfeeling.
  • Merger of journalism and advertising or “sponsored content,” raising serious ethical questions. For details, click.

But there are signs the news business is “bottoming out” from its economic crisis:

Positive trends

Drill Deeper:



Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: